Playeatsleep.fun - This discussion is quite interesting because it involves one of my personal favorite games. This time we're going to talk about historical inaccuracies in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
For those who don't know, Odyssey is one of the series of the franchise Assassin's Creed which is very famous for its setting open world and an epic story. But, did you know that there are some things in this game that don't match the original history?
Even though from the beginning, Assasin's Creed has an interesting point about its history that matches the true story. Then, why is it that historical inaccuracies now appear in the Assassin's Creed Odyssey?
Also Read: 9 Information on the November 2024 release of Assassin's Creed® Shadows!
Creative License vs. Historical Accuracy
Before we get into the details, let's first discuss these two important things: creative license and historical accuracy. As a game with a historical theme, Assassin's Creed strives to deliver an authentic experience.
However, for the sake of excitement and fantasy elements, Ubisoft usually changes some historical details. Now, this is what sparked a lively discussion among the fans.
One of the concerns is the armor design in Odyssey, specifically the use of the bracers. An observant player on the Reddit community, known as Divine-Crusader, noted that many armor designs in Odyssey feature bracers.
In ancient Greece, this protective gear was rarely worn by soldiers. This is where the debate between realism and entertainment starts to heat up.
What are Bracers?
For those who are not familiar, bracers is armor that is usually worn between the wrist and the elbow. In Assassin's Creed Odyssey, the main character is seen wearing bracers as part of the Spartan War Hero armor.
But, in ancient Greek art and artifacts, these bracers are rarely seen. Greek warriors are more often depicted wearing body armor, helmets, and greaves, but not bracers.
Divine-Crusader eventually related this to the illustration of the Greek Hoplite warrior. According to him, the use of sturdy bracers was impractical for Greek soldiers for various reasons, such as cost, comfort, and battle formations that relied more on shields.
Why did Ubisoft choose Bracers?
Okay, now let's guess why Ubisoft still decided to use bracers in this game? There are several arguments from the community that might explain why.
1. Gameplay Mechanics
In RPG games like Odyssey, each armor element usually has its own stats and advantages. With bracers, players will feel more varied to change their armor. So, instead of just having a helmet, armor, and pants, bracers add variety and strategy to character building.
2. Rule of Cool
When it comes to games, we're usually more concerned with cool visuals than historical accuracy. Rule of Cool This means that in-game elements can be more visually appealing, even if they don't match the facts. In Odyssey's case, the armor bracers may look more manly and cool to the player.
3. Fantasy and Mythology
Don't forget, Assassin's Creed Odyssey doesn't just provide historical experiences, but also mythological elements. In this game, we get to meet Greek gods and mythical creatures. So, there are historical inaccuracies in Assassin's Creed Odyssey like these bracers can be part of a more free-spirited and creative approach to fantasy.
Also Read: How to play Assassin's Creed Mirage for free, hurry up before the time runs out!
Responses from Gamers
Interestingly, this discussion sparked many opinions from gamers who played this game. Some supported Divine-Crusader, agreeing that Ubisoft should have been more consistent in following history.
However, there are also those who argue that as long as the gameplay remains exciting and engaging, some inaccuracies can be tolerated.
Some players also argue that although bracers weren't always seen in history, there is archaeological evidence of metal arm guards in the ancient Greek period. So, not entirely wrong either heck that Ubisoft included this element.
Conclusion
So are historical inaccuracies like this a big deal? For some players who prioritize realism, maybe yes. But for others, as long as the game is fun and provides an exciting experience, a little creative liberty can be tolerated.
But in my opinion, Assassin's Creed Odyssey manages to combine history and mythology which is quite OK, with a system of open world which is vast. So, despite the minor inaccuracies, this game remains a crowd favorite for its unforgettable adventure elements.
At the end of the day, it all comes down to personal preference. Are you the type of player who prioritizes historical accuracy or do you prefer cool fantasy elements? Either way, the important thing is to enjoy the gaming experience the way you like it.
So, what do you think, gamers? Are these inaccuracies annoying, or do they make the game more exciting? Share your thoughts in the comments section! Happy gaming!
